Economic decisions during the COVID-19 crisis are being reassessed in light of newly released official documents.

The UK’s public inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has taken a new turn. The 2023 testimony of former Prime Minister and Chancellor Rishi Sunak is once again under close examination. This renewed attention follows the release of previously unseen documents that provide deeper insight into the government’s decision-making during the most critical stages of the health crisis.

At the centre of the controversy is Sunak’s flagship economic policy, the “Eat Out to Help Out” scheme, launched in the summer of 2020 to boost the struggling hospitality sector. The program is now facing criticism from scientists and government advisers who argue it may have contributed to a spike in infections. The new findings suggest that several experts had voiced concerns about the scheme, but their warnings may not have been fully considered by the government.

The inquiry aims to determine whether political choices were prioritized over scientific advice. It is also investigating how decisions were communicated within the cabinet and to the public. Further revelations are expected in the coming weeks, as public pressure mounts and families who lost loved ones to the pandemic continue to demand transparency and accountability.

The final conclusions of the inquiry could have major implications for how the UK prepares for future health emergencies.